Shopping Cart


List All Products
Download Area
Show Cart
Your Cart is currently empty.

Email us or call
(813) 963-5884

Testimonial

“Peter possesses a keen sense and insight for turning telecom services and products into customers and dollars. He is passionate about this industry, his work and the people he serves. Visit his site, read his blog and sign up for his newsletter at marketingideaguy.com and you will discover what makes Peter a sought after marketing consultant.”

Cynthia de Lorenzi, CEO, Patriot Computer Group

Sign of the Times
On Rad's Radar
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 17:59
When Sprint chose Dan Hesse to be CEO in 2007, I was against it. He was a Bell-head who had huge opportunity at Embarq that he wasted. What do I mean? Sprint announced its intention to spin-off its wireline business into a separate company at the end of 2005. Dan Hesse was named CEO a full five months before Embarq was formed in May of 2006. Plus any new CEO has 4 to 6 months of a honeymoon period. Hesse had at least 9 months to come up with a plan to do something with Embarq, and did nothing. He cost cut, laid people off, and litigated with the pensioners. That's wonderful.

Then Sprint gets into trouble and brings Hesse  back as CEO of Sprint-Nextel. WHAT? So he lays off tons of folks. Maybe cuts some costs, but does NOTHING remarkable. In fact, since Hesse became Sprint's leader in late 2007, the company has gone on to lose 4.6M customers.

Did Sprint get the iPhone? No. The Android phone? No. Any new and exciting handset? No. WHy not? Handsets drive sales in mobility.

Do people realize that Sprint still has a fiber network? Not even the folks at Sprint can talk about their MPLS or IP offerings for more than 22 minutes without jumping back to the not-so-shiny gadgets.

Remember when Sprint used to try stuff? The pin-drop ads because they had the first all fiber network. The failed ION project. But still they tried.

Now we see that Hesse raked in $15.5M in compensation in 2008. Let's recap:
  • stock lost 70% of its value in 2008
  • company wrote off billions
  • lost $2.8B
  • people thought it would go into bankruptcy.
  • CEO gets $2.6M bonus on top of his $1.2M salary
This is what's wrong with Corporate America and the Boards of Directors! You wonder why Main Street is fed up. Why consumers don't want to feed the beast any more. Why would I want to spend any more money with Sprint if its all going into the CEO's pocket? And I have to assume that the Directors and other Executives also pocketed some healthy bonus money as well. What a joke.

Read more... [Sign of the Times]
 
Will the Dial-Up Trend Affect VoIP?
On Rad's Radar
Monday, 30 March 2009 21:45
Ars technica doesn't believe the articles in CNET and AOL-Tech about people switching back to dial-up. Well, info from dial-up aggregators indicate that dial-up is on the uptick. As some angry comments mention not everyone needs broadband.

Last year we saw the plateau of broadband subscriber numbers. This year we are seeing an increase in dial-up maybe due to the economic situation we face in the US. Certainly, AOL, Earthlink and United Online are showing revenue increases in their financial statements.

If there was a 10% drop of broadband, would that affect VoIP? Unlikely. It would affect Vonage and 8x8 and other stand-alone VoIP players, but it wouldn't have any effect on the Business VoIP businesses nor on SAAS.

Also, bundling means that the consumer probably doesn't know the pricing of the high speed internet component.

Certainly this has to be a consideration for the RUS and NTIA. What if everyone who wants to live online has broadband? What if the $7B results in just a 10% increase in broadband? Will that justify the $7B? Maybe. If the 10% are all business ventures of one kind or another - eBay, Amazon, affiliates, SOHO, freelancers, tele-workers. 

Read more... [Will the Dial-Up Trend Affect VoIP?]
 
Becoming a CLEC
NSP Strategist
Monday, 30 March 2009 19:20
From the soon-to-be-gone, ISP-CLEC.com list, someone asked:I'm looking into what it would take to startup a voice CLEC for my VoIP operations. .... I plan on hiring Kris Twomey to do the legal wrangling, work with vendors on technical training, get a little grease on my elbows, and then hiring people to fill in the gaps. Is there anything major I'm missing here? SwitchCircuits into

Read Full Article
 
BB Stimulus Update
NSP Strategist
Monday, 30 March 2009 13:55
Microsoft commented to the FCC on the Broadband Stimulus plan. MS said:"Microsoft believes that if the US government were to accomplish just one goal in this process, it should be to ensure that all schools, libraries and hospitals across the nation are connected to future‐proof broadband facilities, such as fiber‐optic cable. By offering these community anchor institutions connections with

Read Full Article
 
Comcast Sues WISP
NSP Strategist
Monday, 30 March 2009 09:34
"Man uses 35 Comcast subscriptions to fuel his own local wireless ISP; Comast, not so happy" - from DSLReports.I guess when the TOS says no Resale, Comcast means it.Imagine what the WISP reputation must be like?

Read Full Article
 
Outsourcing Decision Struggles
NSP Strategist
Monday, 30 March 2009 07:39
FreshBooks has a perspective on Outsourcing Customer Service. [HERE] FreshBooks is an SAAS company that Makes Love to Its Customers, so they believe in fanatical customer care. What do you think?

Read Full Article
 
Strickling to Head NTIA
On Rad's Radar
Monday, 30 March 2009 07:20
The Obama Administration has nominated Larry Strickling to head the NTIA. Right now former Sprint exec, Anna Gomez, is running that department as it gets ready to disperse $4.7B in broadband stimulus money. We don't have a set plan or any procedures in place yet, but picking Larry Strickling should help. Or will it?

Granted picking someone from Sprint probably was a great choice either. (Sprint isn't exactly knocking any socks off). Larry was on Obama's team as a tech advisor. He's a Harvard grad and worked at the FCC up till 2000. According to BroadcastingCable, "Strickling's resume includes Ameritech, Allegiance Telecom, CoreExpress, Network Plus, and he was a partner in the firm of Kirkland and Ellis." Am I missing something?

The head of the NTIA has to interface with the FCC and the USDA/RUS. And by August 1, 2009, start disbursing one-third of the funds under the Broadband Stimulus Plan. There needs to be policies and procedures and guidelines put into place so that (a) the money will actually go to broadband deployment soon; (b) the money can be tracked to ensure that it actually goes for broadband deployment.

The ILEC's have a long history of taking money (and rate hikes) for promises they do not keep. These same companies bought up spectrum and did NOTHING with it. (I hear that Sprint and/or Clearwire are actually looking to sell some spectrum, as is NextWave and Nextlink). So why would we expect these companies to actually deploy broadband in a timely manner now?

Also, this is supposed to be a Stimulus package. Not a help out your Corporate buddy deal. We have had enough of those already. And these companies have laid off by the thousands (Layoff Tracker).

What America needs is for small businesses to get this money.

I don't see how picking another pal of Obama is going to do that. One of the most disappointing things about this new Administration is th elack of creative choices for positions. If people have been there, they have done that. And we don't need THAT. We need a new THIS. Got it? (The people who brought you here, won't get you there).  Where are the round tables of experts to come up with the best plan? We did see the FCC/RUS/NTIA take to the road, but those meetings certainly centered on one or two niche markets. 

Here's my take on the companies that CAN do deploy Broadband across America: Independent ISP's. Guidelines to include:
  • ISP's that are already supplying broadband to rural and non-urban areas.
  • ISP's that have filled out the FCC Form 477.
  • ISP's with at least 8 employees
  • ISP's that are Incorporated.
  • ISP's with a credit line or extensive credit history.
  • ISP's that have a CPA firm.
Why? Because tracking is this money will be a full time job and if you haven't got at least 8 employees and a CPA firm, you probably will fall behind. (And I don't visit clients in jail). The 20% match means you have to have a credit line or be cash flow positive.  This also means that your ISP is a business, not a hobby, that you have been working it as a business for a while and likely will be successful in this new endeavor.

BTW, the Chicago Sun-Times has Larry going to the Commerce Dept.

Read more... [Strickling to Head NTIA]
 
<< Start < Prev 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 Next > End >>

Page 116 of 164