Peter Radizeski is Founder and President of RAD-INFO INC. He is an accomplished blogalyst, speaker, author and consultant. He has helped many service providers with sales training, marketing, channel development and business strategy. He is a trusted source of knowledge about the telecom sector. His honest and direct approach make him a refreshing speaker.

Look for his innovative ideas and analysis of current technology on his blogs.

Meet him at one of the many conferences he attends and speaks at.

Hire RAD-INFO today!

Studying UCaaS

UC is a bucket of ways to communicate – voice, video, conferencing, messaging (SMS, text, IM, chat), presence and more. Some of those buckets are shifting. Voice calls can be made through many apps (like Facebook, WhatsApp, Skype, Google Hangouts, Snapchat, etc. and I am amazed NOT through LinkedIn). Chat is taking over for SMS/text, but the app for chat keeps evolving. Desk phones are going away for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that the office is going away – and employees are declining. Where does that leave the average UCaaS provider?

A survey from BroadSoft found, “one in three small businesses expects to have mobile-only UCaaS solutions in place by 2020.” I guess Verizon decided to jump to the future with its One Talk Mobile service (powered by BSFT). (I wonder how Mast Mobile is doing?)

Same BSFT study found “more than four in five (82%) expect OTT messaging and collaboration software to be the mainstay of communication by 2020, with the remaining 18% saying email will still be the primary messaging tool.” Now they always say email is going away, but Slack does replace internal email to relieve that inbox load. The volume of comms is not going away, it is just shifting to other buckets. But will one of those buckets be yours?

“A report from Osterman Research in November found that two in five business decision makers were either ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ fearful about moving to unified comms (UC). Reasons given for not making the jump include not fully understanding the impact UC would have on their business, as well as various investments in legacy phone systems.” Selling Change is Hard. Selling UCaas on features is harder. Deployment is frightening. User adoption is slow. These issues need to be addressed in the sales process. (It’s called building Trust.)

Businesses buy Microsoft and Cisco for a few reasons: (1) never get fired buying these brands; (2) so many certified people working in enterprise act as brand ambassadors plus trust the brand; and (3) marketing/branding.

There are many studies on UCaaS. Are you reading them? Applying that info to your bundle or sales techniques?

It isn’t that you don’t have a good service (hopefully), it is that you don’t message it; target it; and market it. And you better hurry because the market is quickly being dominated by about 15 companies of the 2000+.

Tags: , , , , ,
Related tags: , , , , ,

Related Entries

  • UC Tidbits #2441Jul 05, 2016
  • Cisco to Spark Some BroadCloud CompetitionDec 28, 2015
  • UCaaS: It isn’t All Bad NewsAug 25, 2016
  • What Pain Does UCaaS Solve?Aug 22, 2016
  • Selling UCaaS as a Solution with Velis4Jun 17, 2016
  • It Will Be an Outsider That Kicks Your ButtFeb 22, 2016
    faster-horses-henry-ford.png
  • Uh Oh, Microsoft is Closing the GapsJan 15, 2016
  • PlumUC Pipes in on Skype4B for Partners Jul 19, 2016
    plum-podcast.png
  • Most Businesses Fear ChangeMay 19, 2016
  • Musings on the Polycom DealApr 18, 2016
  • TrackBacks
    | Comments | Tag with del.icio.us | On Rad’s Radar? Home | Permalink: Studying UCaaS


    Copyright On Rad’s Radar?


    Sellecom: 101 Ideas for Marketing in the Telecom Jungle by Peter RadizeskiSELLECOM: 101 Ideas for Marketing in the Telecom Jungle.

    by Peter Radizeski