Peter Radizeski is Founder and President of RAD-INFO INC. He is an accomplished blogalyst, speaker, author and consultant. He has helped many service providers with sales training, marketing, channel development and business strategy. He is a trusted source of knowledge about the telecom sector. His honest and direct approach make him a refreshing speaker.

Look for his innovative ideas and analysis of current technology on his blogs.

Meet him at one of the many conferences he attends and speaks at.

Hire RAD-INFO today!

News Tidbits Part 2923

A lot of lit tidbits popping up. If you follow me on twitter, then you may have seen some of this already.

newstidbits.jpg

Cyber Monday crashed Target.com, but Tom Peters‘ fans crashed dropbox. Tom Peters put out an email to subscribers this morning with links to 14 chapters of Tom’s top topics including Excellence, Execution and more. The chapters were links on dropbox. But it couldn’t handle the volume so it shut off the account.

Happy Birthday to Microsoft Windows – now 30 years old! MS released Power Apps, which is their next billion dollar business line. BI has a view of it.

Analyst: Verizon and AT&T making $17/subscriber per month in 2015, while T-Mobile and Sprint are losing $0.39 <- headline says it all. [fierce]

Good read: Reality Check: The state of wireline through the CenturyLink lens. “As many economics majors know, being a 42% (Verizon FiOS Internet share; video is lower at 36%) participant in a duopolistic structure might be the best mix that they can achieve in their FiOS regions.” As cable enters the cellular race, there will be revenue pressure on Ma & Pa Bell as cable starts chipping away at the former RBOCs last monopoly position. Comcast entering Enterprise doesn’t help VZ either. Rumor had it they were looking to sell former MCI aka VZB, which turns out only to be a banker’s wet dream.

2 biggest problems for RLECs and ILECs: New revenues are not growing (in absolute terms) as fast as legacy revenues are declining and their cost structures are not dropping as fast as legacy revenues – [from RCR]

Another billion dollar CLEC is pivoting: Granite. As the FCC decides if unbundling of voice network elements will continue, companies like Bullseye, Granite and Birch have to shift revenue to non-POTS. Birch made a deal to have access to 80,000 fiber lit buildings. (That means that most CLECs have access to those same 80K fiber lit buildings btw – either through commercial agreement or an aggregator like GTT.)

Granite has launched GRID, which is for malls and shopping centers. MPLS drop to the mall connects to Granite installed fiber channel and cat6 to provide voice, data and fat pipe (Internet) to the tenants of the mall or shopping center. It is targeted at the mall management company. Chasing Verticals is smart.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Related tags: , , , ,

Related Entries

  • US Government Suing AT&T for FraudApr 26, 2012
  • Why Agents Should Be Pro-CopperOct 11, 2013
  • USTelecom Wants Forbearance for all ILECsApr 09, 2012
    einstein.jpg
  • ReClassify the FCCJul 27, 2010
  • Mergers, Acquisitions and MovesNov 09, 2015
  • The Broadband Competition ProblemSep 23, 2015
  • FCC Moves on Frontier and the InternetSep 14, 2015
  • Promises UnkeptJul 12, 2015
  • At the FCCFeb 24, 2015
  • The RBOCs: Copper, Spectrum, Regulation and SalesFeb 03, 2015
  • TrackBacks
    | Comments | Tag with del.icio.us | On Rad’s Radar? Home | Permalink: News Tidbits Part 2923


    Copyright On Rad’s Radar?

    A Little Channel Conflict

    I know this happens but I have never seen it in print. Channel Conflict is a big issue. It is basically the conflict between the direct sales team and the indirect sales team. This conflict is so bad that some programs allow for teaming – that is when the channel partner works with a direct salesperson of the carrier and they both get credit/compensated for a sale.

    Well, I have a client that has a 100MB pipe from ACC Business, a division of AT&T. The client was under contract with 13 months left on the contract. The client wanted to upgrade to 250MB. ACC Business came back with an excellent price on the the service but with a $50K construction fee for Gigabit fiber. The client balked.

    I escalated the issue at ACC Biz. I looked at other fiber providers near my client.

    Two months later, an AT&T direct rep knocks on the client’s door and says buy from me and I will waive the construction costs. The client signs. The fiber gets installed. The service turns up. No construction costs.

    Channel Conflict.

    And people wonder why I pick on Ma and Pa Bell – AT&T and Verizon.

    Tags: , , , ,
    Related tags: , , , , ,

    Related Entries

  • AT&T: Transform from Agent to ProviderMar 03, 2014
  • Schools and Libraries are Off LimitsMay 12, 2011
  • Congrats to AT&T PartnersFeb 07, 2011
  • Contract Termination ClassDec 17, 2010
  • Where’s ACC Business Going?Mar 12, 2009
  • AT&T Striking and HidingMar 11, 2009
  • The Rotten Apple in the ChannelNov 04, 2008
  • Phone Companies, Channel and Other NewsMay 29, 2015
    copper.jpg
  • Charter Ditches WholesaleApr 22, 2015
    hourglass-sand-time-glass.jpg
  • What Business Model Should the VAR Examine?Mar 30, 2015
  • TrackBacks
    | Comments | Tag with del.icio.us | On Rad’s Radar? Home | Permalink: A Little Channel Conflict


    Copyright On Rad’s Radar?

    A Little Channel Conflict

    I know this happens but I have never seen it in print. Channel Conflict is a big issue. It is basically the conflict between the direct sales team and the indirect sales team. This conflict is so bad that some programs allow for teaming – that is when the channel partner works with a direct salesperson of the carrier and they both get credit/compensated for a sale.

    Well, I have a client that has a 100MB pipe from ACC Business, a division of AT&T. The client was under contract with 13 months left on the contract. The client wanted to upgrade to 250MB. ACC Business came back with an excellent price on the the service but with a $50K construction fee for Gigabit fiber. The client balked.

    I escalated the issue at ACC Biz. I looked at other fiber providers near my client.

    Two months later, an AT&T direct rep knocks on the client’s door and says buy from me and I will waive the construction costs. The client signs. The fiber gets installed. The service turns up. No construction costs.

    Channel Conflict.

    And people wonder why I pick on Ma and Pa Bell – AT&T and Verizon.

    Tags: , , , ,
    Related tags: , , , , ,

    Related Entries

  • AT&T: Transform from Agent to ProviderMar 03, 2014
  • Schools and Libraries are Off LimitsMay 12, 2011
  • Congrats to AT&T PartnersFeb 07, 2011
  • Contract Termination ClassDec 17, 2010
  • Where’s ACC Business Going?Mar 12, 2009
  • AT&T Striking and HidingMar 11, 2009
  • The Rotten Apple in the ChannelNov 04, 2008
  • Phone Companies, Channel and Other NewsMay 29, 2015
    copper.jpg
  • Charter Ditches WholesaleApr 22, 2015
    hourglass-sand-time-glass.jpg
  • What Business Model Should the VAR Examine?Mar 30, 2015
  • TrackBacks
    | Comments | Tag with del.icio.us | On Rad’s Radar? Home | Permalink: A Little Channel Conflict


    Copyright On Rad’s Radar?

    The Move Into Canada

    RingCentral has a deal in place with TELUS, a telecom company like AT&T in Canada. 8×8 has had its Virtual Office suite in Canada since 2013. Today, Zayo announced that they were buying Allstream, a division of MTS in Canada. Allstream has a 35,000 km fibre-optic network and provides communications services to enterprise clients including the Canadian government. A good amount of inter-city and metro fiber is in the mix.

    “Zayo said it plans to integrate Allstream’s 30,000 kilometres of fibre into its own core operations and create the only “pan-U.S./Canada communications infrastructure provider,” writes the Globe and Mail.

    It was a good deal for Zayo at about $500M. Now they can expand in Canada like they have in Europe but with the ability to leverage one of Canada’s largest business to business telecom operator. Zayo is “targeting CAD $300M of revenue, a >40 percent EBITDA” – that is a 5 year ROI.

    I think a lot of operators are looking outside the US because the cost of customer acquisition is high here. And maybe being global gets you bigger customers – or at least a different segment of the marketplace.

    I also think that there aren’t many more fiber providers in the US that Zayo can acquire — and especially none this big with this much upside.

    Tags: , ,
    Related tags: ,

    Related Entries

  • The M&A Picks Up SteamJan 14, 2015
    mergers-ma.jpg
  • 2 Small AcquisitionsDec 14, 2012
  • Zayo Grabs FirstOct 17, 2012
    FirstComm2011.jpg
  • Zayo Buys AboveNetMar 19, 2012
  • Mergers, Acquisitions and MovesNov 09, 2015
  • FCC Moves on Frontier and the InternetSep 14, 2015
  • Integra Expands With Fiber BuyAug 18, 2015
  • Fiber Play: NTELOS Bought by ShentelAug 13, 2015
    1980s-tape.jpg
  • M&A Rumor MillMay 04, 2015
  • News Tidbits Part 2917Apr 27, 2015
  • TrackBacks
    | Comments | Tag with del.icio.us | On Rad’s Radar? Home | Permalink: The Move Into Canada


    Copyright On Rad’s Radar?

    Apex Technology Services
    Sponsored by Apex Technology Services, a leading IT Services company

    The Move Into Canada

    RingCentral has a deal in place with TELUS, a telecom company like AT&T in Canada. 8×8 has had its Virtual Office suite in Canada since 2013. Today, Zayo announced that they were buying Allstream, a division of MTS in Canada. Allstream has a 35,000 km fibre-optic network and provides communications services to enterprise clients including the Canadian government. A good amount of inter-city and metro fiber is in the mix.

    “Zayo said it plans to integrate Allstream’s 30,000 kilometres of fibre into its own core operations and create the only “pan-U.S./Canada communications infrastructure provider,” writes the Globe and Mail.

    It was a good deal for Zayo at about $500M. Now they can expand in Canada like they have in Europe but with the ability to leverage one of Canada’s largest business to business telecom operator. Zayo is “targeting CAD $300M of revenue, a >40 percent EBITDA” – that is a 5 year ROI.

    I think a lot of operators are looking outside the US because the cost of customer acquisition is high here. And maybe being global gets you bigger customers – or at least a different segment of the marketplace.

    I also think that there aren’t many more fiber providers in the US that Zayo can acquire — and especially none this big with this much upside.

    Tags: , ,
    Related tags: ,

    Related Entries

  • The M&A Picks Up SteamJan 14, 2015
    mergers-ma.jpg
  • 2 Small AcquisitionsDec 14, 2012
  • Zayo Grabs FirstOct 17, 2012
    FirstComm2011.jpg
  • Zayo Buys AboveNetMar 19, 2012
  • Mergers, Acquisitions and MovesNov 09, 2015
  • FCC Moves on Frontier and the InternetSep 14, 2015
  • Integra Expands With Fiber BuyAug 18, 2015
  • Fiber Play: NTELOS Bought by ShentelAug 13, 2015
    1980s-tape.jpg
  • M&A Rumor MillMay 04, 2015
  • News Tidbits Part 2917Apr 27, 2015
  • TrackBacks
    | Comments | Tag with del.icio.us | On Rad’s Radar? Home | Permalink: The Move Into Canada


    Copyright On Rad’s Radar?

    Apex Technology Services
    Sponsored by Apex Technology Services, a leading IT Services company