Peter Radizeski is Founder and President of RAD-INFO INC. He is an accomplished blogalyst, speaker, author and consultant. He has helped many service providers with sales training, marketing, channel development and business strategy. He is a trusted source of knowledge about the telecom sector. His honest and direct approach make him a refreshing speaker.

Look for his innovative ideas and analysis of current technology on his blogs.

Meet him at one of the many conferences he attends and speaks at.

Hire RAD-INFO today!

Your Webinar Sucks!

As an agent I get invited to too many webinars, training, lunch-n-learns and events. Here is where you go wrong:

Vendors try to puke every ounce of information at me in 40 minutes! UGH!!!

Look at it from this view:

  • What makes a TED Talk great?*
  • What is popular on radio? Howard Stern, Sports talk radio, Rush
  • What makes podcasts work? Interviews, banter, tips and tricks
  • What makes YouTube work? Gary Vee!

What doesn’t work? You puking your entire catalog and every fact and figure at me.

Have you taken an online course or a college course recently? They teach one chapter of a book per week in college according to my adjunct professor friends. One chapter per week. Not the whole book in 45 minutes!

The key is to pick one nugget, one take away and present it clearly and concisely. Be Interesting, so that people become Interested.

You know what we want to know?

  • How do we make money from this one product you are pushing (this quarter)?
  • Who is buying?
  • Why are they buying it?
  • Why are they buying it from YOU?

* If you don’t know what a TED Talk is, stop presenting!

Also, Practice. Don’t wing it.

Present from a quiet place like an office, not the airport, your car, or live from Starbucks.

Tags: , ,
Related tags: ,

Related Entries

  • Show Wrap Up: Too Much Reckless BehaviorAug 17, 2016
  • Where Are We Now? Ode to the AgentAug 09, 2016
  • Nothing But Vanilla PuddingJul 29, 2016
    IMG_20140813_145516.jpg
  • Startup Advice for Non-StarupsMay 05, 2016
  • Where is the Channel Going?Oct 26, 2015
  • What Are You Learning Today?Jul 29, 2015
  • Some Observations on UC&CMay 21, 2015
  • Getting PerspectiveMay 14, 2015
  • What Happened in Vegas?Mar 19, 2015
  • 2015Jan 01, 2015
  • TrackBacks
    | Comments | Tag with del.icio.us | On Rad’s Radar? Home | Permalink: Your Webinar Sucks!


    Copyright On Rad’s Radar?

    Rumor: Level3 to Merge with CenturyLink

    This was the big rumor yesterday that the Wall Street Journal started. There was speculation back in July about Level3 being up for sale. There even was the rumor that Comcast was going to buy L3.

    Level3 has a bad quarter financially and the C-Suite says, “Don’t look here! Look over there!”

    Also, bankers! Besides the C-Suite, Bankers are the only ones making money on these deals. So yeah that want more M&A – as overall M&A activity in 2016 is down. Truthfully, bankers have ruined telecom with all this M&A.

    Yesterday I was at a TelAdvocate event in Tampa. No agent there thought it was a good idea. Emails from other agents are basically panic. We just got done with integration. Please not another one!!!

    What do they get with this merger? Two very opposite cultures. One is mainly an RLEC. One is mainly a wholesaler. Not does that match up?

    Level3 fiber is everywhere that Qwest is with its Genuity, Gobal Crossing and own long haul fiber. L3 could probably do a better job selling colocation and data center that C-Link.

    The big picture is that you would have a larger telco with massive debt — and declining revenue. Since CenturyLink has debt of around $20B with about $18B in revenue and Level 3 has debt of about $10B with $8B in annual revenue, the combined entity would have $26B in revenue and $30B in debt. Plus years of integration work, layoffs, confusion, and eventually lost revenue and a lousy organization.

    As brokers of telecom, we want choice in the marketplace. This doesn’t achieve that.

    I am hoping this is just a banker balloon. Both stocks moved up, so maybe someone was just doing some day trading.

    Tags: , ,
    Related tags: , , ,

    Related Entries

  • National Harbor: In the BubbleAug 17, 2016
  • The Last CLEC PivotJul 14, 2016
  • 20 Years and what?Feb 10, 2016
  • Fiber Play: NTELOS Bought by ShentelAug 13, 2015
    1980s-tape.jpg
  • Promises UnkeptJul 12, 2015
  • News Tidbits Part 2917Apr 27, 2015
  • One Deal And One BullhornMay 09, 2013
  • Some Interesting ReadsMar 13, 2013
  • An Agent’s take on Level3Nov 06, 2012
  • The Fall of the CLECsOct 04, 2012
  • TrackBacks
    | Comments | Tag with del.icio.us | On Rad’s Radar? Home | Permalink: Rumor: Level3 to Merge with CenturyLink


    Copyright On Rad’s Radar?

    Apex Technology Services
    Sponsored by Apex Technology Services, a leading IT Services company

    Rumor: Level3 to Merge with CenturyLink

    This was the big rumor yesterday that the Wall Street Journal started. There was speculation back in July about Level3 being up for sale. There even was the rumor that Comcast was going to buy L3.

    Level3 has a bad quarter financially and the C-Suite says, “Don’t look here! Look over there!”

    Also, bankers! Besides the C-Suite, Bankers are the only ones making money on these deals. So yeah that want more M&A – as overall M&A activity in 2016 is down. Truthfully, bankers have ruined telecom with all this M&A.

    Yesterday I was at a TelAdvocate event in Tampa. No agent there thought it was a good idea. Emails from other agents are basically panic. We just got done with integration. Please not another one!!!

    What do they get with this merger? Two very opposite cultures. One is mainly an RLEC. One is mainly a wholesaler. Not does that match up?

    Level3 fiber is everywhere that Qwest is with its Genuity, Gobal Crossing and own long haul fiber. L3 could probably do a better job selling colocation and data center that C-Link.

    The big picture is that you would have a larger telco with massive debt — and declining revenue. Since CenturyLink has debt of around $20B with about $18B in revenue and Level 3 has debt of about $10B with $8B in annual revenue, the combined entity would have $26B in revenue and $30B in debt. Plus years of integration work, layoffs, confusion, and eventually lost revenue and a lousy organization.

    As brokers of telecom, we want choice in the marketplace. This doesn’t achieve that.

    I am hoping this is just a banker balloon. Both stocks moved up, so maybe someone was just doing some day trading.

    Tags: , ,
    Related tags: , , ,

    Related Entries

  • National Harbor: In the BubbleAug 17, 2016
  • The Last CLEC PivotJul 14, 2016
  • 20 Years and what?Feb 10, 2016
  • Fiber Play: NTELOS Bought by ShentelAug 13, 2015
    1980s-tape.jpg
  • Promises UnkeptJul 12, 2015
  • News Tidbits Part 2917Apr 27, 2015
  • One Deal And One BullhornMay 09, 2013
  • Some Interesting ReadsMar 13, 2013
  • An Agent’s take on Level3Nov 06, 2012
  • The Fall of the CLECsOct 04, 2012
  • TrackBacks
    | Comments | Tag with del.icio.us | On Rad’s Radar? Home | Permalink: Rumor: Level3 to Merge with CenturyLink


    Copyright On Rad’s Radar?

    Apex Technology Services
    Sponsored by Apex Technology Services, a leading IT Services company

    Multi-Tasking

    A funny quote from twitter on multi-tasking: “I’m great at multitasking. I can waste time, be unproductive, and not be bothered to do anything all at once.”

    If you need some help with management, sign up for the webinar HERE.

    ____ Peter Radizeski is a telecommunications consultant and analyst with RAD-INFO INC. Service Providers have called on RAD-INFO INC for assistance improving sales, managing online marketing efforts, channel sales enablement and overall company strategy. Contact RAD-INFO INC at 813-963-5884 or https://rad-info.net

    Musings on Ma Bell

    On my other blog, I linked to two WSJ graphics that show all of the consolidation in telecom. There is also a link to the fact that 6 companies own 90% of the media in the US. Consolidation under Obama has been unfettered.

    I wonder back to when AT&T tried to buy T-Mobile in 2011. That Obama Admin said NO. Despite the fact that AT&T was actively helping the NSA and other 3-letter agencies since before 2006, when Klein exposed Room 641A.

    Then there is the other program that AT&T runs for the feds: “Hemisphere was used far beyond the war on drugs to include everything from investigations of homicide to Medicaid fraud.” The Daily Beast explains how AT&T is spying on Americans for profit. (It would be weirder if they were just doing it for fun.)

    Barry Eisler spells out how all this works via his “fictional” book God’s Eye View.

    AT&T has hedged its bets since the T-Monile No. It won approval for DirecTV. It plans to get a Yes from the DOJ – and has told the FCC that they don’t have a say in this acquisition.

    From NEXTDRAFT by Dave Pell: “Will the AT&T acquisition of TimeWarner get federal approval? Before you place your bet, consider this data provided by the NYT: “AT&T is the biggest donor to federal lawmakers and their causes among cable and cellular telecommunications companies, with its employees and political action committee sending money to 374 of the House’s 435 members and 85 of the Senate’s 100 members this election cycle.”

    Why are they buying TW? Well, to catch up to VZ and Comcast. And because all the pies are flat. AT&T had a bad quarter. VZ has a had a couple. They are laden with debt. Cellular which is half the revenue or more is being picked apart by T-Mobile and to a much smaller extent Sprint. Cable is eating the wireline broadband lunch*. Since all of the bets were on cellular, it is now a run to use fixed wireless (LTE or licensed) for broadband deployment which will increase ARPU for them — and the bills to consumers.

    Ma and Pa Bell have spent tens of billions on spectrum. They will use it to get out of terrestrial broadband and have everything be wireless. They will still have to figure out the T-Mobile problem as well as the cable wi-fi problem.

    They want content to build a walled garden – like Facebook or AOL before them. When you own the content you can be king, just ask Comcast/NBCU or Disney.

    The one thing that will kill off the telco is an economic depression. When the US experiences another economic slowdown – like say 3Q2017 – consumers will have a lot less money to spend. That means ARPU will not go – and subscriber counts will go down. When you have to eat, you skip HBO and cable TV.

    The auto industry is already feeling this crunch. More leasing, less sales, more discounts, interest free loans. The cars last longer. And driverless cars are coming.

    One reason for immigration is to actually increase the population of the US. Millennials aren’t having kids – in many cases because student loan debt and poor salaries make a child too expensive, except by accident.

    In the midst of this noise 2 things to note: (1) ABRY is selling Masergy to Berkshire Partners for about $1 Billion dollars. The reports say $900M; I was told it is more than that.

    (2) Google Fiber is laying off. The CEO of Google Access, Craig Barratt, is also stepping down. Too few subscribers, too many hassles means they will try fixed wireless then probably call it a day. The Duopoly of cable and telco have successfully squashed competition. And for all the little guys cheering, it could be you next!

    Please note that in the middle of all this, despite the skyrocketing analyst forecasts, cloud computing is not mentioned in this scenario. Why? It amounts to peanuts in revenue for the Duopoly. “Total SaaS/PaaS revenues of top 50 software companies globally are $22.4B. Microsoft, Oracle, IBM, SAP, Symantec, EMC, VMWare, HP, Salesforce and Intuit are the top ten software companies worldwide,” according to Fortune and PWC. Unless they were to buy Salesforce to gain $5.5Billion in revenue, they have to go content. Microsoft bought LinkedIN for $26B!! And LI revenue isn’t even $4B dollars.

    IOT isn’t even a billion dollars in revenue for VZW yet. So how do you move the revenue needle at the former Bells?

    * Per telecompetitor, “The number of U.S. fixed broadband subscribers dropped by nearly 200,000 on a net basis in 2Q 2016, a decline of 0.2 percent, according to the latest market data from Point Topic.”

    Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
    Related tags: , , , , ,

    Related Entries

  • Copper is Coming to an EndOct 05, 2016
    power-lines-unsplash-small.jpg
  • Tidbits #2438Jun 07, 2016
  • Are the Telcos in Deep Trouble?Jan 06, 2016
  • News Tidbits Part 2923Nov 30, 2015
    newstidbits.jpg
  • News Tidbits Part 2919Jul 30, 2015
  • News Tidbits Part 2917Apr 27, 2015
  • Cable Will WinFeb 16, 2015
    winning_charlie_sheen.jpg
  • 360, OpenRange and Hosting.comOct 11, 2011
  • A Couple of M&A ItemsSep 09, 2011
  • Telecom Tidbits #2435May 16, 2016
  • TrackBacks
    | Comments | Tag with del.icio.us | On Rad’s Radar? Home | Permalink: Musings on Ma Bell


    Copyright On Rad’s Radar?