Peter Radizeski is Founder and President of RAD-INFO INC. He is an accomplished blogalyst, speaker, author and consultant. He has helped many service providers with sales training, marketing, channel development and business strategy. He is a trusted source of knowledge about the telecom sector. His honest and direct approach make him a refreshing speaker.

Look for his innovative ideas and analysis of current technology on his blogs.

Meet him at one of the many conferences he attends and speaks at.

Hire RAD-INFO today!

The Top 10 List

The awards, the top 10 list, the top 20, and the Magical Quadrant. It’s all nonsense. I am a chemist by degree and trade (11 years as a chemist in pharma). Where’s the methodology?

There are 2000+ providers offering Hosted VoIP, SIP Trunking and UC. Add in Contact Center and that number probably jumps by another hundred. How do you widdle it down to 10? How do you give an award?

Most of it is a version of pay to play. You have to be engaged with the people giving the awards. If you aren’t actively engaged with the folks handing out the prize, then you can’t get one – even if your VoIP product cures cancer. Even if you have 80% margin, 0.01% churn, 100K happy end users.

Now that churn number is bullsh!t all the way around. If churn was indeed as low as claimed – and CAGR was what was reported – in the 15 years that 2000 companies have been trying to talk businesses into buying UC, don’t you think market penetration would be higher than 15%????

It’s all marketing shenanigans. SPIN. PR. You don’t need cool tech apparently; you need to pay Gartner and hire a great PR firm.

Do More than Re-bill

FISPA grew by being a volume buying group (mainly for BellSouth, later AT&T and then some cable programs). However, most programs are shifting away from wholesale and volume buying. AT&T is pushing either the APEX program for each service provider or a commercial agreement.

The ISPs want a true wholesale program to resell cable, DSL and fiber as their own. This has been the desire of ISPs since 1999 when DSL hit the market. This is at odds with the desire of the Duopoly. Neither cable nor ILEC want to resell their network for wholesale rates to ISPs. The Duopoly wants to own the customer; same as the ISP does.

As I have said many times before, Layer 1 or Layer 7. Either build your own network – fiber, wireless, whatever – or bundle better! SaaS providers have a higher multiple on exits than telcos or service providers.

ISPs like the simple business plan of re-billing someone else’s network. I get it, but that model is coming to an end.

The current FCC UNE Forbearance petition by the USTA (ILECs) says that copper is going away. Facilities-based CLECs are in danger after the sunset of UNE, since prices will increase 15% at least — and who has an extra 15% margin??? Not many when the main selling point is price.

Layer 7 means Bundle Better. You need a triple play or quad play that is NOT the same as the Duopoly.

I’ve written about bundling before many times. I can just assume that everyone likes just being a smaller replica of the big guys with the motto, “We suck less.”

Google, Facebook, Amazon and Apple (GAFA) have more value than any Duopoly company – maybe the 4 GAFA have more market value than all 10 duopoly providers. They did it without becoming ISPs — except Google who did the Google Fiber project to force the Duopoly’s hand.

You can to.

Everything is Relative

This isn’t me picking on Telarus. All the master agencies do this. It drives me crazy, but Telarus has been in my newsfeed all week, so…

“BullsEye benefits from 4,000 Telarus sales partners,” according to CP.  That’s like RingCentral using the number 200K sub-agents in an investor deck.  It isn’t how many inked an agreement; it is how many get a check.  In fact, how many get a substantial check?

The same day, the Telarus CEO says that 60% of the VARs will be wiped out! So does that 200K or that 4K number shrink?

Actually, we had a shift in VARs after Office365 hit the market because many Microsoft partners shifted to ISVs or selling another vendor. Dell, Xerox and HP VARs have had to shift and re-invent themselves. IBM partners have been forced to shift many times over the years. Some retire, some sell, some close, most pivot. That is how it has always been.

To keep hearing how everyone in the channel is going to die because they aren’t selling cloud is old. (We have been hearing it for 7+ years!) It is like saying a restaurant is going to close if they don’t start selling healthier food.

Those yelling this forget something: Most of the channel are old white men. They are thinking of retirement, not re-starting the business.

Also, when you say that 30-60% of the VARs are dead – “Edwards said a few years ago, the IT distributors he spoke to were projecting 30 percent of their VARs to fall off the map.” – who do you mean? Define VAR.

And if that prediction were indeed true a few years ago: the stock of Tech Data, SCanSource and Ingram would be tumbling.

On Revenue…

When the press release says 120% increase in SD-WAN, it is relative. In 2016, SD-WAN was just starting (to the tune of $5K in revenue for Telarus).

Over three-quarters of revenue still comes from Network. I’d like to see the figures from other master agencies, but my guess is that it is similar.

The one thing they didn’t talk about: that the master agency model is in peril. Surviving on a razor thin margin is tough without scale. (Maybe that is why they talk about all the agreements that have been inked = scale.) MDF is what is keeping them afloat. The masters are now more akin to Tech Data than to what they were 5 years ago.

They need more partners – but they need those partners to sell – and to sell without a whole lot of support from the master – or the partner is unprofitable.

Maybe 5 years ago, everyone chased VARs. Now everyone is chasing MSPs. Some are chasing non-traditional partners. They are all in the same boat.

The major carriers have consolidated. The CLEC sector is almost gone. Many CLECs are pivoting to the MSP model. There are many MSPs with channel programs. Because the hardest part of any business is SALES! The MSP segment is in the throes of huge M&A. There are 3 transactions per day. That isn’t very stable.

I just wish they could be honest with the numbers. And stop saying everyone is going out of business. You know who IS going out of business? FTR!

UPDATE:

Telarus responded on LinkedIn that 658 agents participate. That is 16%. Thanks, Pareto!

8×8 Financials: Quick Napkin Math

8×8 put out its 4Q2018 revenue report and year end

1M+ business users
$75.3 million service revenue in 4Q2018 equals $25 per user per month

ARPU of $469 = average sale is 18 users at $25 per month

The report is a lot of hype about going upmarket but they still have losses, which I get are a corporate thing – but will they ever make a profit?

Telecom Tidbits # 2474

My buddy at MOJO offers a Telecom Marketing Plan and Budget Template.

UC Service Providers are looking at SMBs Wrong according to Edgewater Networks. The study identifies 4 segments of the SMB market. Companies with fewer than 20 employees; 20-49; 50-99; 100-500. I look at that differently: 1-4; 5-10; 11-20; 20-49; 50-99; 100-199; 200-500. Each has different sales triggers and needs. Market accordingly.

GDPR is Upon Us.

One-in-five employees is now willing to sacrifice future pay increases for better healthcare benefits, according to a recent PwC survey.

FreedomPop to Offer $15 Unlimited Cellular Data Under ‘Unreal’ Brand. FreedomPOP is an MVNO on Sprint. “FreedomPop’s platform is enabling large companies like Dish to launch new MVNO brands in months.”

“Digging into the results, cable industry customers were increasingly dissatisfied compared to 2017 with picture quality, helpfulness of staff, frequency of service interruptions, and call center assistance,” according to Fortune.

REMINDER:

UNE Forbearance petition at the FCC by USTA – FCC WC Docket No. 18-141 (Comments or Oppositions Due: June 7, 2018) – see HERE and HERE